Chapter I: A Shifting Reef Chapter I A SHIFTING REEF The year 1866 was marked by a bizarre development, an unexplained and downright inexplicable phenomenon that surely no one has forgotten. Without getting into those rumors that upset civilians in the seaports and deranged the public mind even far inland, it must be said that professional seamen were especially alarmed. Traders, shipowners, captains of vessels, skippers, and master mariners from Europe and America, naval officers from every country, and at their heels the various national governments on these two continents, were all extremely disturbed by the business. In essence, over a period of time several ships had encountered "an enormous thing" at sea, a long spindle-shaped object, sometimes giving off a phosphorescent glow, infinitely bigger and faster than any whale. The relevant data on this apparition, as recorded in various logbooks, agreed pretty closely as to the structure of the object or creature in question, its unprecedented speed of movement, its startling locomotive power, and the unique vitality with which it seemed to be gifted. If it was a cetacean, it exceeded in bulk any whale previously classified by science. No naturalist, neither Cuvier nor Lacépède, neither Professor Duméril nor Professor de Quatrefages, would have accepted the existence of such a monster sight unseen--specifically, unseen by their own scientific eyes. Striking an average of observations taken at different times--rejecting those timid estimates that gave the object a length of two hundred feet, and ignoring those exaggerated views that saw it as a mile wide and three long--you could still assert that this phenomenal creature greatly exceeded the dimensions of anything then known to ichthyologists, if it existed at all.

Now then, it did exist; this was an undeniable fact; and since the human mind dotes on objects of wonder, you can understand the worldwide excitement caused by this unearthly apparition. As for relegating it to the realm of fiction, that charge had to be dropped. In essence, on July 20, 1866, the steamer Governor Higginson , from the Calcutta & Burnach Steam Navigation Co., encountered this moving mass five miles off the eastern shores of Australia. Captain Baker at first thought he was in the presence of an unknown reef; he was even about to fix its exact position when two waterspouts shot out of this inexplicable object and sprang hissing into the air some hundred and fifty feet. So, unless this reef was subject to the intermittent eruptions of a geyser, the Governor Higginson had fair and honest dealings with some aquatic mammal, until then unknown, that could spurt from its blowholes waterspouts mixed with air and steam. Similar events were likewise observed in Pacific seas, on July 23 of the same year, by the Columbus from the West India & Pacific Steam Navigation Co. Consequently, this extraordinary cetacean could transfer itself from one locality to another with startling swiftness, since within an interval of just three days, the Governor Higginson and the Columbus had observed it at two positions on the charts separated by a distance of more than seven hundred nautical leagues.

Fifteen days later and two thousand leagues farther, the Helvetia from the Compagnie Nationale and the Shannon from the Royal Mail line, running on opposite tacks in that part of the Atlantic lying between the United States and Europe, respectively signaled each other that the monster had been sighted at latitude 42°15'' north and longitude 60°35'' west of the meridian of Greenwich. From their simultaneous observations, they were able to estimate the mammal''s minimum length at more than three hundred fifty English feet; this was because both the Shannon and the Helvetia were of smaller dimensions, although each measured a hundred meters stem to stern. Now then, the biggest whales, those rorqual whales that frequent the waterways of the Aleutian Islands, have never exceeded a length of fifty-six meters--if they reach even that. One after another, reports arrived that would profoundly affect public opinion: new observations taken by the transatlantic liner Pereire , the Inman line''s Etna running afoul of the monster, an official report drawn up by officers on the French frigate Normandy , dead-earnest reckonings obtained by the general staff of Commodore Fitz-James aboard the Lord Clyde . In lighthearted countries, people joked about this phenomenon, but such serious, practical countries as England, America, and Germany were deeply concerned. In every big city the monster was the latest rage; they sang about it in the coffeehouses, they ridiculed it in the newspapers, they dramatized it in the theatres. The tabloids found it a fine opportunity for hatching all sorts of hoaxes. In those newspapers short of copy, you saw the reappearance of every gigantic imaginary creature, from "Moby Dick," that dreadful white whale from the high arctic regions, to the stupendous kraken whose tentacles could entwine a five-hundred-ton craft and drag it into the ocean depths.

They even reprinted reports from ancient times: the views of Aristotle and Pliny accepting the existence of such monsters, then the Norwegian stories of Bishop Pontoppidan, the narratives of Paul Egede, and finally the reports of Captain Harrington--whose good faith is above suspicion--in which he claims he saw, while aboard the Castilian in 1857, one of those enormous serpents that, until then, had frequented only the seas of France''s old extremist newspaper, the Constitutionalist . An interminable debate then broke out between believers and skeptics in the scholarly societies and scientific journals. The "monster question" inflamed all minds. During this memorable campaign, journalists making a profession of science battled with those making a profession of wit, spilling waves of ink and some of them even two or three drops of blood, since they went from sea serpents to the most offensive personal remarks. For six months the war seesawed. With inexhaustible zest, the popular press took potshots at feature articles from the Brazilian Historic and Geographic Institute, the Royal Prussian Academy of Sciences in Berlin, the British Association for the Advancement of Science, the Smithsonian Institution in Washington, DC; at discussions in the Indian Archipelago , in Cosmos published by Father Moigno, in Petermann''s Mittheilungen ; and at scientific chronicles in the great French and foreign newspapers. When the monster''s detractors cited a saying by the botanist Linnaeus that "nature doesn''t make leaps," witty writers in the popular periodicals parodied it, maintaining in essence that "nature doesn''t make lunatics," and ordering their contemporaries never to give the lie to nature by believing in krakens, sea serpents, "Moby Dicks," and other all-out efforts from drunken seamen. Finally, in a much feared satirical journal, an article by its most popular columnist finished off the monster for good, spurning it in the style of Hippolytus repulsing the amorous advances of his stepmother, Phaedra, and giving the creature its quietus amid a universal burst of laughter.

Wit had defeated science. During the first months of the year 1867, the question seemed to be buried, and it didn''t seem due for resurrection, when new facts were brought to the public''s attention. But now it was no longer an issue of a scientific problem to be solved, but a quite real and serious danger to be avoided. The question took an entirely new turn. The monster again became an islet, rock, or reef, but a runaway reef, unfixed and elusive. On March 5, 1867, the Moravian from the Montreal Ocean Co., lying during the night at latitude 27°30'' and longitude 72°15'', ran its starboard quarter afoul of a rock marked on no charts of these waterways. Under the combined efforts of wind and four-hundred-horsepower steam, it was traveling at a speed of thirteen knots.

Without the high quality of its hull, the Moravian would surely have split open from this collision and gone down together with those 237 passengers it was bringing back from Canada. This accident happened around five o''clock in the morning, just as day was beginning to break. The officers on watch rushed to the craft''s stern. They examined the ocean with the most scrupulous care. They saw nothing except a strong eddy breaking three cable lengths out, as if those sheets of water had been violently churned. The site''s exact bearings were taken, and the Moravian continued on course apparently undamaged. Had it run afoul of an underwater rock or the wreckage of some enormous derelict ship? They were unable to say. But when they examined the ship''s undersides in the service yard, they discovered that part of its keel had been smashed.

This occurrence, extremely serious in itself, might perhaps have been forgotten like so many others, if three weeks later it hadn''t been reenacted under identical conditions. Only, thanks to the nationality of the ship victimized by this new ramming, and thanks to the reputation of the company to which this ship belonged, the event caused an immense uproar. No one is unaware of the name of that famous English shipowner Cunard. In 1840 this shrewd industrialist founded a postal service between Liverpool and Halifax, featuring three wooden ships with four-hundred-horsepower paddle wheels and a burden of 1,162 metric tons. Eight years later, the company''s assets were increased by four six-hundred-fifty-horsepower ships at 1,820 metric tons, and in two more years, by two o.