1 The Project I have a good marriage. I had a good marriage before I spent a year improving it, and I have a good marriage now. In fact, my marriage is better, truly better. Although not in the ways I''d expected. When I set out to improve my marriage, I assumed that better would look like a Photoshopped version of good : essentially unchanged, unsightly elements gone. Dan would no longer butcher headless, skinless pigs and goats on our kitchen island. I would not tidy up, literally and psychologically, by shoving junk in drawers. We would quit outsourcing the production of our children''s religious identities to our parents.
We''d stop vibing-yes, vibing, we used that word-our bank balances, spending more when we felt flush, less when we felt broke. Instead I got a better marriage in the "before enlightenment, chop wood carry water; after enlightenment, chop wood carry water" sense. I feel humbled, grateful, and transformed, and Dan is still leaving single brown socks (how to tell if they''re dirty or clean?) strewn about the house. The first time Dan and I discussed the possibility of a better marriage we were lying in bed, under our white duvet, amid our white walls, in that little sanctuary of peace and purity that Dan had built for us in our flimsy, hundred-year-old earthquake shack of a house. I believed in marriage. I liked being married. But I did not feel expert at it. Shortly after our wedding, nine years prior, we''d started to joke that we needed to take more advantage of being two people, that we really shouldn''t do our errands together, write for the same editors, read the same magazines.
Back then, Dan had felt alarmed, nearly panicked, that some nights we''d sprawl together on the couch reading our then-still-separate subscriptions to The New Yorker . Weren''t lovers supposed to maintain, even exaggerate, differences? Certainly his happily married parents had. I was an even less likely candidate than Dan for a wholly merged life. One of my more telling memories of myself as a young woman and of how unbending I was in love happened the evening a new boyfriend wanted to make me a cilantro-lime pesto, and instead of walking with him on that warm spring evening to buy limes, I suggested he run the errand alone. By the time I met Dan, at age twenty-eight, I''d shed some of that rigidity. I knew more about who I was, so I felt more comfortable being swayed. But nearly a decade into marriage, and sincerely hoping to remain married to Dan for many decades more, I did not understand how much I should be swayed by my husband. What algorithm should determine how much I tipped over into the warm bath of our union and how much of myself to keep separate, outside? Since our wedding, Dan and I had been bumbling along, more or less successfully, with two basic ground rules: no cheating and no dying.
We spoke these rules out loud to each other. We considered their breakages the only trespasses our marriage could not survive. But that night, under our white duvet, as I lay next to Dan''s warm and increasingly muscled body, I started wondering why we were being so cavalier. Why weren''t we caring more for our marriage, making it as strong as it could be? Dan is really the very best thing that''s happened in my life. He squints like Clint Eastwood. He calls me "darling." He''d cook me three meals a day if I let him (which I don''t; again, the question of independence). He''s a great conversationalist and he makes me feel like one of the more interesting people on earth.
So why were we bumbling ? Why weren''t we being more deliberate? I''ve never been one to leave well enough alone, nor have I ever believed that marriage is binary-that one moment you''re single and the next you''re not, some alchemy happening at the altar. I''ve always believed that you get married, truly married, slowly, over time, through all the dental plaque you inadvertently flick into each other''s faces; through all the sunsets you watch on remote Baja beaches after you''ve locked your keys in your rental car, again; through all the near-hypothermic panic attacks because you decided it would be a good idea to swim together from Alcatraz to San Francisco; through all the frozen pig skulls your spouse power saws in half (in order to make pork stock); through all the pain, tears, and absurdity; through small and large moments you never expected to happen and certainly didn''t plan to endure. But then you do: You endure. That night, for dinner, I endured a deep-fried pig''s tail. (Same pig, opposite end.) Some other wife might have endured the NFL. And as I lay next to Dan, later, feeling gustatorily put out, I started wondering why I was being so passive. Not in the sense that I wasn''t fighting back.
Why wasn''t I applying myself more to being a spouse? I loved Dan utterly. I even made him say this aloud- Lizzy loves me utterly- whenever he felt depressed. My marriage was the very center of my life. Sure, we''d taken some hits and suffered some losses, enough to know life and love are fragile. But none had driven a major wedge, at least as far as we acknowledged. So we just kept cruising, promising each other we would not cheat and we would not die, working off the lazy theory: so far so good. This motivational soft spot around marriage was not unique to my own. Most of my peers had spent their twenties and thirties applying themselves: to school, work, sports, health, friendship, and, most recently, parenting-which in my case meant trying to figure out how best to raise an eight-year-old so lost in her dreams of The Secret Garden that she falls off the kitchen stool while eating breakfast, and a five-year-old so outrageous she''s on track to be the next Sarah Silverman.
But in this critical area-marriage-we''d shrugged and turned away. I wanted to understand why. I wanted to stop accepting this. Dan, too, had spent his twenties and thirties working tirelessly-okay, obsessively-at skill acquisition. Over the course of our eleven years together, he''d taught himself to be a meticulous carpenter and excellent, if catastrophically messy, chef. He''d buy mountainous stacks of books. Read. Take notes.
Practice. Read more. Take more notes. Practice more. Repeat. In this way he''d learned to sweat pipe, run electrical wiring, hang drywall, cut stringers for stairs, salt cod, cure pancetta, build sourdough starter, reduce fifty dollars'' worth of veal bones down to two cups of stock. On the night in question,Dan had been working on his so-called "fitness unit," studying the obscure Soviet-era weight-training manuals of Tudor Bompa, in hopes of transforming his already-reasonably-fit forty-one-year-old body into that of a young marine. My point here is that this man, my husband, was not an if-it''s-not-broke-don''t-fix-it kind of person.
Yet he, too, shared the seemingly ubiquitous aversion to the concept of looking inside and trying to improve our marriage, and doing so not because our marriage was in crisis but just because marriage is so important and prone to drift. That night, in bed, the image that came to mind, and that I shared with Dan, was that I''d been viewing our marriage like the waves on the ocean-a fact of life, determined by the sandbars below, shaped by destiny and the universe, not by me. And this, suddenly, seemed ridiculous. I am not a fatalistic person. In my twenties I even believed that people made their own luck. Part of the luck I believed I''d made for myself arrived in the form of Dan himself, three days after I''d moved to San Francisco, in the spring of 1998. Meeting this rugged freckled redhead was beyond the best-case scenario I''d envisioned for a move I''d worked diligently, of course, to make quite smooth. Before leaving Chicago, where I''d been living, I''d arranged to rent a small office in a group space for San Francisco writers called the Grotto.
Every Tuesday these mostly young, mostly single writers met at a bar called Mars. That first Tuesday, in walked Dan. He looked like he''d just climbed out of the ocean, as in not even showered before pulling on his jeans. His nose was straight, sunburned, and peeling. He had salt caked on his eyelashes and in his hair. He was tall, angular, calm, and handsome, and when he talked he covered his mouth with a hand, to hide the gap between his teeth. But I liked this-his vulnerability, his apparently thin skin. I thought it made him approachable.
He had blue eyes, startlingly clear, which he also hid behind ancient gold-rimmed glasses. They were the most beautiful eyes I''d ever seen. Just that afternoon, Dan told me, he''d gotten "bageled," meaning he''d caught no waves, while surfing Ocean Beach. "I know, it''s pretty pathetic, right?" he said, nodding, covering his mouth, seeing if he could recruit me to agree. "No, it''s not pathetic at all," I said. "Or is it? I mean, I don''t really know." "Believe me, it''s pathetic," Dan said. He was a big hunky insecure mess.
Dan was also a catch. A few years earlier he''d written a surf memoir called Caught Inside, and for this, in a review, he''d been anointed an "ontologist of dudedom, Henry David Thoreau doing aerials on a fiberglass board." Dan didn''t tell me about the book. Mostly he wanted me to know that prior to getting bageled he''d spent the day depressed, lying on the floor of his room, staring at the glow-in-the-dark stars the previous tenant had glued to the ceiling. I learned about the memoir the following day when I walked up Valencia Street and bought Caught Inside myself. I didn''t read the memoir for months. I was too scared. I just memorized the jacket copy and stared at Dan''s author photo.
He stood on.