Good and Mad CHAPTER ONE SLEEPING GIANT The contemporary reemergence of women''s rage as a mass impulse comes after decades of feminist deep freeze. The years following the great social movements of the twentieth century--the women''s movement, the civil rights movement, the gay rights movement--were shaped by deeply reactionary politics. When Phyllis Schlafly led an antifeminist crusade to stop the ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment--the twenty-four-word constitutional amendment that would have guaranteed equal rights regardless of gender--finally succeeding in 1982, it was a sign that the second-wave feminist movement of the 1970s, and the righteous fury that had ignited it, had been sidelined. More broadly, the Reagan era, in which increasingly hard-right reactionary politics had joined with a religious "moral majority," gave rise to a cultural backlash to all sorts of social progress. Under sharp attack were the benefits, rights, and protections that afforded poor women any stability, as well as the parts of the women''s movement that had produced legal, professional, and educational gains for middle-class women, better enabling them to live independently, outside of marriage, the patriarchal institution that had historically contained them and on which they had long depended. The right wing of the 1980s was driven to restrict abortion access and deregulate Wall Street while simultaneously destroying the social safety net, which Ronald Reagan had made sure was embodied by the specter of the black welfare queen. A 1986 Newsweek cover story, meanwhile, blared the news that a single woman at forty was more likely to get killed by a terrorist than get married. That later-debunked study was a key point of Susan Faludi''s chronicle of the era, Backlash, in which she tracked the varied, suffocating ways in which women''s anger was muffled throughout the Reagan years: how feminist activism was blamed for the purported "man shortage"; the day-care that enabled women to work outside the home vilified as dangerous for children.

Popular culture showed liberated white career women as oversexed monsters, as in Fatal Attraction, or as cold, shoulder-padded harpies who had to be saved via hetero-union or punished via romantic rejection (see Diane Keaton in Baby Boom, Sigourney Weaver in Working Girl). There was far too little space afforded to black heroines, and even some of the most nuanced were often crafted to serve male creators'' investments in how women''s liberation might serve their messages: Spike Lee''s view of the sexually voracious Nola Darling in the 1986 film She''s Gotta Have It and Bill Cosby''s Clair Huxtable, the successful matriarch who, given the context of Cosby''s own racial politics, served as a repudiation of black women who were not wealthy hetero-married mothers with law degrees. Who wanted to be a feminist? No one. And the anxiety about the term wasn''t about any of the good reasons to be skeptical of feminism--like the movement''s racial exclusions and elisions--but because the term itself, the idea of public and politicized challenge to male dominance, had been successfully coded as unattractively old, as crazy, as ugly. Susan Sarandon, the rare celebrity who actually maintained her publicly left politics through the 1980s and 90s, once explained why even she of the unrelenting commitment to disruptive political speech preferred the misnomer "humanist" to calling herself a "feminist": "it''s less alienating to people who think of feminism as being a load of strident bitches."1 To be sure, there were eruptions of fury, coming from people--often from women--who were waging battles against inequities. In 1991, the law professor Anita Hill testified in front of an all-white, all-male Senate Judiciary Committee that Clarence Thomas, her former boss at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, then a nominee for the Supreme Court, had sexually harassed her. Many women were taken aback by the way the committee insulted, dismissed, and ultimately disbelieved Hill, confirming Thomas to the court, where he sits today.

"It was so stark, watching these men grill this woman in these big chairs and looking down at her," Patty Murray, senator from Washington state, has recalled. Murray and a lot of other women were so outraged by the treatment of Hill that an unprecedented number of them ran for office in 1992. Four, including Murray, won Senate seats; one of them, Carol Moseley Braun, became the first-ever African-American woman elected to the Senate. Twenty-four women were elected to the House of Representatives for the first time, more than had been elected in any other previous decade. These years sometimes included violent rage in response to racism: in 1992, after four white cops were acquitted by a mostly white jury in the brutal beating of African-American taxi driver Rodney King in Los Angeles, the city erupted in fury. Angry protesters looted stores and set fires; sixty-three people died. At the time, the news media and local politicians were quick to describe the events as riots, throwing around the term "thugs." But one Los Angeles Democratic representative saw something else in the riots: "There are those who would like for me .

to tell people to go inside, to be peaceful, that they have to accept the verdict. I accept the responsibility of asking people not to endanger their lives. I am not asking people not to be angry," said first-term congresswoman Maxine Waters, who represented a big part of the South Central Los Angeles neighborhood where much of the unrest was unfolding. "I am angry and I have a right to that anger and the people out there have a right to that anger."2 Waters spent days tending to her constituents, bringing food, water, and diapers to Angelenos living without gas or electricity; she also pushed to charge the police officers civilly, and objected to Mayor Tom Bradley''s use of the word "riot" to describe events. Instead, she saw the politically rational frame for the resentments being expressed, calling it "an insurrection."3 Eventually, Los Angeles Police Chief Daryl Gates was fired, and two of the police officers were convicted for violating Rodney King''s civil rights.4 There were other moments of political protest: those against the World Trade Organization in Seattle in 1999 and marches against the invasion of Iraq in 2003, for example.

But much of the spirit of mass, brash, sustained political fury that had animated the 1960s and 1970s was muffled in the 1980s and stayed that way for decades. The journalist Mychal Denzel Smith has written of how this suppression worked itself out around expressions of black rage in the years in which he''d grown up, noting that during most of the 1990s, "there was no longer a Reagan or a Bush to serve as an identifiable enemy," and that a pop commitment to "multiculturalism" permitted the illusion that racial progress had been achieved, so rage as a mass impulse had subsided.5 There had been a brief revival during the second Bush administration, Smith argued, recalling how, in the wake of the derelict response to Hurricane Katrina, rapper Kanye West had yelled that George W. Bush "doesn''t care about black people." But that surge of fury had been quieted by the presidential campaign of Barack Obama. Obama''s historic drive had relied in part on his ability to reassure white voters that he was not an angry black man, that he was cut from a different cloth than some of his more bellicose black predecessors, including Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, and did not in his demeanor threaten white supremacy. But Obama''s reputation for cordiality was gravely imperiled by the appearance of old-style black rage, when Reverend Jeremiah Wright, the man who had married the Obamas, became a campaign story, along with his much-played sermon, during which he''d exhorted, "God damn America!" The specter of Wright''s version of confrontational blackness was enough to remind America of Obama''s outsider status, and thus Obama was forced to quash it, becoming, in Smith''s words, "the first viable black presidential candidate to throw water on the flames of black rage." The anger expressed by Wright, Obama would say in his famous speech on race, "is not always productive; indeed, all too often it distracts attention from solving real problems.

" But partway through the Obama administration, some political fury had begun to bubble over and break through this veneer of calm, in part driven by, or in ways that meaningfully sidelined, the angry voices of women. ANGER RIGHT AND LEFT Perhaps the most politically effective strike came from the right, with the Tea Party protests that began in 2009, soon after President Barack Obama took office. In response to Obama''s plan to bail out some homeowners who''d been caught in the housing crisis, cable news reporter Rick Santelli angrily called on television for the "Tea Party" to object. The reference, of course, was to the 1773 revolutionary protest of colonists who threw tea in Boston Harbor to register their objection to being taxed by Britain, which was using tariffs not to support the colonies but to stabilize its own floundering economy, and had imposed them on colonists who had no representation in British Parliament.6 The contemporary versio.