Introduction One Minute to Midnight ARE YOU CONCERNED about education? I am. One of my deepest concerns is that while education systems around the world are being reformed, many of these reforms are being driven by political and commercial interests that misunderstand how real people learn and how great schools actually work. As a result, they are damaging the prospects of countless young people. Sooner or later, for better or for worse, they will affect you or someone you know. It''s important to understand what these reforms are about. If you agree that they''re going in the wrong direction, I hope you will become part of the movement to a more holistic approach that nurtures the diverse talents of all our children. In this book, I want to set out how the standards culture is harming students and schools and to present a different way of thinking about education. I want to show too that whoever and wherever you are, you do have the power to make the system change.
Changes are happening. All around the world, there are many great schools, wonderful teachers, and inspiring leaders who are working creatively to provide students with the kinds of personalized, compassionate, and community-oriented education they need. There are entire school districts and even national systems that are moving in the same direction. People at all levels of these systems are pressing for the changes I''m arguing for here. In 2006, I gave a talk at the TED conference in California called "Do Schools Kill Creativity?" The essence of that talk was that we''re all born with immense natural talents, but by the time we''ve been through education far too many of us have lost touch with them. As I put it then, many highly talented, brilliant people think they''re not because the thing they were good at in school wasn''t valued or was actually stigmatized. The consequences are disastrous for individuals and for the health of our communities. It has proven to be the most watched talk in the history of TED.
It has been viewed online more than thirty million times and has been seen by an estimated three hundred million people worldwide. I know that''s not as many views as Miley Cyrus gets. But I don''t twerk. Since that talk was posted online, I''ve heard from students all around the world who say they''ve shown it to their teachers or parents, from parents who say they''ve shown it to their children, from teachers who''ve shown it to their principals, and from superintendents who''ve shown it to everybody. I take this as evidence that I''m not alone in thinking this way. And these are not recent concerns either. I was speaking last year at a U.S.
college in the Midwest. Over lunch, one of the faculty said to me, "You''ve been at this a long time now, haven''t you?" I said, "At what?" He said, "Trying to change education. How long is it now? Eight years?" I said, "What do you mean, eight years?" He said, "You know, since that TED talk." I said, "Yes, but I was alive before that." I''ve now worked in education for more than forty years as a teacher, researcher, trainer, examiner, and adviser. I''ve worked with all sorts of people, institutions, and systems in education and with businesses, governments, and cultural organizations. I''ve directed practical initiatives with schools, districts, and governments; taught in universities; and helped to set up new institutions. In all of this, I''ve been pushing for more balanced and individualized and creative approaches to education.
In the last ten years especially, I hear people everywhere saying how exasperated they are by the deadening effects of testing and standardization on them, their children, or their friends. Often they feel helpless and say there''s nothing they can do to change education. Some people tell me they enjoy my talks online but are frustrated that I don''t say what they can do to change the system. I have three responses. The first is, "It was an eighteen-minute talk; give me a break." The second is, "If you''re really interested in what I think, I''ve published various other books, reports, and strategies on all of this, which you may find helpful."1 The third response is this book. I''m often asked the same questions: What''s going wrong in education and why? If you could reinvent education, what would it look like? Would you have schools? Would there be different types? What would go on in them? Would everyone have to go, and how old would they have to be? Would there be tests? And if you say I can make a difference in education, where do I begin? The most fundamental question is, what is education for ? People differ sharply on this question.
Like "democracy" and "justice," "education" is an example of what the philosopher Walter Bryce Gallie called an "essentially contested concept." It means different things to different people according to their cultural values and how they view related issues like ethnicity, gender, poverty, and social class. That doesn''t mean we can''t discuss it or do anything about it. We just need to be clear on terms.2 So, before we go on, let me say a few words about the terms "learning," "education," "training," and "school," which are sometimes confused. Learning is the process of acquiring new knowledge and skills. Human beings are highly curious learning organisms. From the moment they''re born, young children have a voracious appetite for learning.
For too many, that appetite starts to dull as they go through school. Keeping it alive is the key to transforming education. Education means organized programs of learning. The assumption of formal education is that young people need to know, understand, and be able to do things that they wouldn''t if left to their own devices. What those things are and how education should be organized to help students learn them are core issues here. Training is a type of education that''s focused on learning specific skills. I remember earnest debates as a student about the difficulty of distinguishing between education and training. The difference was clear enough when we talked about sex education.
Most parents would be happy to know their teenagers had sex education at school; they''d probably be less happy if they''d had sex training. By schools , I don''t mean only the conventional facilities that we are used to for children and teenagers. I mean any community of people that comes together to learn with each other. School, as I use the term here, includes homeschooling, un-schooling, and informal gatherings both in person and online from kindergarten to college and beyond. Some features of conventional schools have little to do with learning and can actively get in the way of it. The revolution we need involves rethinking how schools work and what counts as a school. It''s also about trusting in a different story about education. We all love stories, even if they''re not true.
As we grow up, one of the ways we learn about the world is through the stories we hear. Some are about particular events and personalities within our personal circles of family and friends. Some are part of the larger cultures we belong to--the myths, fables, and fairy tales about our own ways of life that have captivated people for generations. In stories that are told often, the line between fact and myth can become so blurred that we easily mistake one for the other. This is true of a story that many people believe about education, even though it''s not real and never really was. It goes like this: Young children go to elementary school mainly to learn the basic skills of reading, writing, and mathematics. These skills are essential so they can do well academically in high school. If they go on to higher education and graduate with a good degree, they''ll find a well-paid job and the country will prosper too.
In this story, real intelligence is what you use in academic studies: children are born with different amounts of this intelligence, and so naturally some do well at school and some don''t. The ones who are really intelligent go on to good universities with other academically bright students. Those who graduate with a good university degree are guaranteed a well-paid professional job with their own office. Students who are less intelligent naturally do less well at school. Some may fail or drop out. Some who finish high school may not go any further in education and look for a lower-income job instead. Some will go on to college but take less academic, vocational courses and get a decent service or manual job, with their own toolkit. When it''s put so baldly, this story may seem too much of a caricature.
But when you look at what goes on in many schools, when you listen to what many parents expect of and for their children, when you consider what so many policymakers around the world are actually doing, it seems that they really believe that the current systems of education are basically sound; they''re just not working as well as they should because standards have fallen. Consequently, most efforts are focused on raising standards through more competition and accountability. You may believe this story too and wonder what''s wrong with it. This story is a dangerous myth. It is one of the main reasons why so many reform efforts do not work. On the contrary, they often compound the very problems they claim to be solving. They include the alarming rates of nongraduation from schools and colleges, the levels of stress and depression--even suicide--among students and their teachers, the falling value of a university degree, the rocketing costs of getting one, and the rising levels of unemployment among graduates and nongraduates alike. Politicians often scratch their heads over these problems.
Sometimes, th.