1 - A Future LostDuring the second world war, Britain looked to Canada for assistance in providing Lancaster bombers. The National Steel Car plant in Malton, Ontario, was chosen to manufacture those bombers, as it was already building aircraft parts. In November 1942, the federal government acquired the company, changing its name to Victory Aircraft Limited. The firm soon became renowned for building superior Lancasters. In 1943, Sir Roy Dobson, managing director of A.V. Roe, a division of Hawker Siddeley, located in Manchester, U.K.

, visited the company and was very impressed.After the war, Sir Roy returned to Canada, and, working with Fred T. Smye, the director of aircraft production at Victory, and other Victory officials, established discussions with C.D. Howe, the Canadian minister of munitions and supply to acquire Victory on a rental-purchase plan, providing the management of Hawker Siddeley agreed. On December 1, 1945, the deal was finalized, and A.V. Roe Canada was established.

Fred Smye was appointed assistant general manager and would become the administrative force behind A.V. Roe Canada''s projects.The creation of the company meant that Canada at last had the capacity to design and build its own aircraft, both for the commercial market and for the Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF), freeing it from the necessity of relying on foreign sources.In 1946, Turbo-Research Limited, another Crown Corporation, this one involved in engine research, was acquired by A.V. Roe to design and build engines. On December 2, 1954, A.

V. Roe was split into the newly named Avro division, responsible for aircraft design and production, and Orenda, responsible for engine design and production. After much discussion with officials from Trans-Canada Airlines and C.D. Howe, A.V. Roe was given the go-ahead to embark on the C102 Jetliner design, a commercial, regional, passenger jet aircraft, a type of aircraft that didn''t exist at the time. Likewise, after separate discussions with the RCAF and Howe, the CF-100, a military subsonic fighter, was given the green light.

Both were begun in 1946. The Jetliner would fly in 1949 but would not be produced. At that time, it was said that the company had to focus on the CF-100 for the Korean War effort. The CF-100 though would not become operational until 1953, after that war was over.In January 1952, the RCAF realized that the CF-100 would need to be replaced as it could soon be rendered obsolete as a defence tool for Canada by advances in Soviet aircraft design. Following deliberations between Canada, the United States, and Great Britain, and the examination of numerous studies of existing aircraft, a decision was made to design and develop a supersonic jet interceptor -- the Avro Arrow. The plan was to design a plane able to prevent any attack from Soviet aircraft entering North American airspace from over the North Pole. It would need to have a speed and altitude capability not then available in any other military aircraft.

***By the time the Avro Arrow program was cancelled on February 20, 1959, a date dubbed Black Friday by the media, A.V. Roe Canada Limited had become the third-largest company in Canada, behind the Canadian Pacific Railway and the Aluminum Company of Canada. Part of A.V. Roe''s portfolio of companies included the Dominion Steel and Coal Corporation, along with numerous others, but its key subsidiaries remained Avro, its aircraft division, and Orenda, its engine division.When the Arrow program was terminated, some twenty-five thousand employees lost their jobs; fourteen thousand of those had been working for Avro and Orenda, the rest were employed by the company''s various other subsidiaries or by the subcontractors working on the program. On February 26, 1959, ten thousand employees packed into the Coliseum building at the Canadian National Exhibition grounds in Toronto in a massive protest against the cancellation, the government, and, in particular, the prime minister, John Diefenbaker.

Many had signs indicating they had voted for the Conservatives once but would never do so again. In the end, the protests had no effect in getting the cancellation reversed. Diefenbaker would, however, go on to be defeated in the election of 1963.The fallout from the cancellation was enormous and extended far beyond the obviously significant loss of twenty-five thousand jobs. The Financial Post of September 20, 1958, published a list of businesses across Canada that would lose contracts as a result of the termination. The article stated that one hundred thousand Canadians would be affected, along with many new industries, particularly in the area of electronics.According to author and ex-Avro employee E.K.

Shaw, 650 major subcontractors were working on various aspects of the program. Their orders for work in 1959 would total some $25 million. To quote from an internal memo that was sent to remaining employees some three months after the cancellation:No effort has been made to date to settle termination contracts with any of the hundreds of companies involved. Many of them are owed from hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars for investments already made in plant equipment and tooling and for complete parts and equipment already supplied complete for the first 37 aircraft. Many of these firms are facing bankruptcy as a result. However, if these contract termination charges were to appear in the government''s budget in the current year, it would become obvious at once to even the most thoughtless Canadian that we had not only lost a $300 million investment, but that it had also cost us as much to scrap it as it would have to complete it. Not only did the cancellation of the Arrow program have significant financial consequences for many companies, a Globe and Maileditorial in December 1958 observed the following:One of the virtues of the Arrow''s development has been its contribution to Canada''s industrial diversification. With the Arrow (and CF-100) expenditures, we have bought new skills, new techniques, new industrial processes and plants which otherwise would not exist, but which today range far beyond the needs of the Avro program in their service to Canada.

With the demise of the Arrow, continued expansion into areas of advanced technology were lost. Many of the top employees left not just the company, but Canada. Writing in Ideas in Exile, historian J.J. Brown observed the following:[I]n economic terms alone, the decision [to cancel the Avro programs] was one that was to impair our standard of living for decades to come. This is not so much because of the money lost . but chiefly because the Avro design team that it had gathered with so much difficulty from all over the world was, in 1958, considered the best aircraft team in North America. These men''s ideas stimulated a ferment in nearly every other Canadian industry.

This would have resulted in a host of new products and techniques. But with the cancellation of the Arrow, the team dispersed almost immediately. Indeed, twenty-five top engineers ended up at NASA working on John Glenn''s space capsule and later gaining major positions in the Gemini and Apollo space programs. Jim Floyd returned to Britain to work for the Advanced Project Group at Hawker Siddeley Aviation. There, that group carried out the early feasibility studies with British Aircraft Corporation (BAC), on what was being called the U.K. supersonic transport, or U.K.

SST, before it was renamed the Concorde. Later, from 1965 to 1972, Floyd was a consultant with the British government on the operations and economics of the Concorde in an airline environment, including studies on the sonic boom. A few other employees ended up in various American and European firms, including McDonnell Douglas and Fokker International. But it was not like this for all.Frank Harvey came to Canada in 1956 after serving as an apprentice with de Havilland in England. He started with Avro in October of 1956 in the repair and overhaul department working on the CF-100. From there, he moved to work on the Arrow, in the flight test department, until the axe fell on Black Friday. After losing his job in this high-technology sector, he went to work in delivery for Simpson''s, a department store in downtown Toronto.

From there, he moved to Thistletown, Ontario, to work at his dad''s service station. In 1963, he returned to Toronto and obtained employment at de Havilland Canada, which by now had acquired the Avro plant.Ian Mitchell joined Avro in 1957, after graduating as a mechanical engineer from McGill University in Montreal. He was interested in aviation and, in particular, with the work at Avro, but he also applied to Spartan Air Services in Ottawa and Genaire in St. Catharines. Avro offered him employment in the Arrow''s ground support equipment design unit, and at a higher rate of pay than his other offers, so he moved to Toronto. The city had the added attraction of having an RCAF reserve unit, 400 squadron. He had been a member of the reserves in Montreal, and this was an opportunity to continue that involvement.

Mitchell enjoyed his brief period at Avro and was devastated by the cancellation. He found himself not just unemployed but rather disheartened with the state of aeronautical work in Canada -- in his view, it was mostly tied to defence and, therefore, dependent on politics. As a young, single graduate, he knew he had options. He was also not so upset at being fired for any personal failing, because he had been fired in such excellent company, with some especially talented individuals. He did feel bad for many who had recently emigrated from other countries, most notably the United Kingdom. They had families, they had purchased homes, they had left careers back home, and, after a short period in Canada, they were now unemployed.He considered his options, but took his time, noting that, for example, de Havilland, Canadair, and Trans-Canada Airlines were not hiring.